One subject, in depth · bridged to Sideline US
FightIndex
2010s MMA · most active 2010s

Emily Kagan

66″ reach · +4.75% reach advantage · 79th percentile

MMA record

3–3

Emily Kagan has a reach of 66″ against a height of 63″ — a reach advantage of +4.75%, long for 2010s MMA and the 79th percentile of the 653 compared here.

2010win v Glena Avila, 2012, decisionwin v Lynae Lovato, 2012, decisionwin v Ashley Cummins, 2013, decisionloss v Rose Namajunas, 2013, submissionloss v Angela Hill, 2014, decisionloss v Kailin Curran, 2015, submission
WON ABOVE·LOST BELOW BAR = STOPPAGE·BROKEN BAR = SUBMISSION·TICK = DECISION 2012–2015

SOURCE·Emily Kagan — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2026-03-29

How this record is compiled

  1. Measurements come from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the bout list is parsed from the results table on the same article, read on 2026-03-29. Boxing tables are read by header name and MMA records by the fixed column order of the MMA record template — two different parsers, because reading MMA rows as a boxing table returns a fighter's boxing record in place of their real one.
  2. A bout enters the ledger with whatever fields the source states: result, opponent, method, round, year. Any field the source leaves empty stays empty here. A date that cannot be established is left blank rather than inferred, and the bout is still counted.
  3. A no contest is counted and printed as a no contest. It is never folded into the wins, the losses or the draws, and it never disappears to make a total balance.
  4. Where the article's infobox total disagrees with its own results table, both figures are published and each is labelled with where it came from. Nothing is averaged and nothing is reconciled against a second database.
  5. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 653 2010s MMA fighters in the dataset — the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Sources, exclusions and known limits →

Bout record

Every bout the article's own results table lists, in order. A dash is a field the source leaves empty — it is not a zero and it is not a guess.

Bout-by-bout recordAUG 2026
YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2015 L Kailin Curran Submission2
2014 L Angela Hill Decision3
2013 W Ashley Cummins Decision3
2013 L Rose Namajunas Submission3
2012 W Glena Avila Decision3
2012 W Lynae Lovato Decision3

4 of these opponents have their own page here.

SOURCE·Emily Kagan — English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0)·derived figures computed here·REVIEWED 2026-03-29

Reach in context

Reach advantage

+4.75%

66″ reach on a 63″ frame

Compared against 653 2010s MMA fighters — no weight class is on record for Emily Kagan, so the comparison is by era. Median 2.75%.

-3.2%2010s MMA reach advantage12.9%
Measurements
Reach66″ (167.6 cm)8th pct
Height63″ (160 cm)3rd pct
Stance—
DivisionStrawweight MMA
Most active decade2010s — 6 of 6 dated bouts
CountryUnited States

Record

MMA record

3–3

6 bouts on record

Finish rate

0%

of wins ended inside the distance — strawweight MMA median 54%, 0th percentile

Decision: 3 (100%)
  • Decision 100%

The career, bout by bout

6 recorded bouts from 2012 to 2015. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

win vs Glena Avila (2012)win vs Lynae Lovato (2012)win vs Ashley Cummins (2013)loss vs Rose Namajunas (2013)loss vs Angela Hill (2014)loss vs Kailin Curran (2015)
winlossdraw / NC2012–2015

Career span

4y

2012–2015

Longest unbeaten run

3

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2012

2 bouts

Recorded bouts

6

6 with a date

Standing questions

What this record does and does not say

What is Emily Kagan's record?
3–3 in MMA. That is the aggregate stated in the English Wikipedia infobox; the results table on the same article lists 6 bouts individually.
Does a no contest change a record here?
No. A no contest is not a win, a loss or a draw, and it is never folded into one. It is counted and printed separately, so a 20–0 record with two no contests is shown as exactly that rather than as 22–0 or as 20–0 with the no contests dropped. The same applies to a bout overturned after the fact where the source records the change.
What happens when sources disagree about a fight?
This site publishes one source — the fighter's English Wikipedia article, read on the date printed under every table — and it does not silently reconcile that against anyone else's database. Where the article's own infobox total and its own results table disagree, both are shown and the page says which one each figure came from. Nothing is averaged, and no field is filled in from a second source to make a total balance.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.